Acevedo v. San Diego, County of et al
| Juan Acevedo |
| San Diego, County of and John and Jane Doe 1 through 100 |
| 3:2016cv02042 |
| August 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Riverside |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b) (2). Clerk directed to issue a summons as to Pla's Complaint. US Marshal ordered to serve a copy of the Complaint and Summons upon Dfts. Court orders the served Dfts to reply to Pla's Complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of FRCP 12(a). Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/12/2016. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (IFP Package prepared and mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
