Thornberry v. Lizarraga
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Thornberry
Respondent: Joseph Lizarraga
Case Number: 3:2016cv02083
Filed: August 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER granting Respondent's 64 Motion to Dismiss. Court overrules Petitioner's Objections 75 , 79 , 81 , and adopts in its entirety the Magistrate Judge's 74 Report and Recommendation. Because the Petitioner has not made a su bstantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, Court denies him a certificate of appealability. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 11/17/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
September 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 74 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 64 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Scott Kernan. Court recommends that the district judge grant Respondent's motion and dismiss the Second Amended Petition. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2017. Replies due by 10/16/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 9/15/2017. (jah). Modified on 9/15/2017 - Copy of this Order mailed to Petitioner via U.S. Mail Service. NEF Regenerated (jah).
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER denying Petitioner's 55 Second Motion to Expand the Record. Petitioner fails to show that the factual predicate of his claim could not have been discovered during the course of his state court proceedings or that he can establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is eligible for Prop 47 relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/2/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Court approves and adopts 20 Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and grants Petitioner Daniel Lee Thornberry's 13 Motion to Amend the Petition. Court orders the Clerk to file pages 3-16 of P etitioner's 13 Motion to Amend the Petition as Petitioner's First Amended Petition. Court overrules Petitioner's 21 Objection to Judge Stormes' 11/9/2016 Order Denying Motion to Expand the Record. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 12/6/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah). Modified on 12/7/2016 - Edited file date. Regenerated NEF (jah).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornberry v. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Thornberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph Lizarraga
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?