Bentley v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
Plaintiff: Curtis Bentley
Defendant: Midland Credit Management Inc and Midland Funding LLC
Case Number: 3:2016cv02157
Filed: August 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge: Mitchell D. Dembin
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER RE: Joint Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Second Consolidated Amended Complaint and Related Member Cases. The Court DISMISSES Fetai, Baker's member case (16-cv-2768-MMA (MDD)), and Bentley's member case (16-cv-2157-MMA (MDD)). Each part y shall bear its own costs. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate member cases 16-cv-2768-MMA (MDD) and 16-cv-2157-MMA (MDD) in their entirety. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to file this Order on the dockets of 11-md-2286-MMA (MDD), 16-cv-2768-MMA (MDD), and 16-cv-2157-MMA (MDD). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/2/2020. (tcf)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Denying 673 Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and Certification for Interlocutory Review. The parties are to proceed to arbitration as per the Court's prior Order. See Doc. No. 669 at 17-18. Plaintiffs' individual member actions (16cv2157-MMA (MDD) and 16cv2768-MMA (MDD)) remain stayed and administratively closed. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/17/2019.(rmc)
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re: 16 Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, Strike Class Allegations, and Stay Proceedings. The Court grants in part Defendants' motion. Specifically, the Court grants Defendants' motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff s' claims on an individual basis and stays their individual member actions (16cv2157-MMA (MDD) and 16cv2768-MMA (MDD)). The Court denies Defendants' request to stay the putative class action in this MDL and strike class allegations because Fetai has not been compelled to arbitrate his claims. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate all pending motions, deadlines, and hearings, and administratively close Plaintiffs' individual cases (16cv2157-MMA (MDD) and 16cv2768-MMA (MDD)). The parties must notify the Court within 7 days of the conclusion of arbitration proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/31/2019. (rmc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bentley v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis Bentley
Represented By: Shpetim Ademi
Represented By: John D Blythin
Represented By: Mark A Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Funding LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?