O'Malley et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: O'Malley, Michael Scott O'Malley and Cathleen Kay O'Malley
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 3:2016cv02298
Filed: September 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Karen S Crawford
Referring Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 3/21/2017. (jao) (sjt).
March 16, 2017 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Michael Scott O'Malley (Hanson, John) (jao).
February 3, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Cathleen Kay O'Malley, Michael Scott O'Malley (Hanson, John) QC EMAIL - lacking proper signature (fth).
January 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting #4 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant must respond to the Complaint on or before Friday, February 3, 2017. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 1/19/2017. (jao)
January 18, 2017 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Anderson, Sotera)Attorney Sotera L Anderson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft) (jao).
January 6, 2017 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Scott O'Malley. All Defendants served. (Hanson, John) (jao).
September 13, 2016 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mxn)
September 13, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ford Motor Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-9406060.), filed by Michael Scott O'Malley, Cathleen Kay O'Malley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:16-cv-2298-W-KSC. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Hanson, John)(mxn) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Malley et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Sotera L Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Scott O'Malley
Represented By: John W Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathleen Kay O'Malley
Represented By: John W Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?