Limpin v. McSeveney et al
| Melchor Karl T. Limpin |
| Robert McSeveney, Jeh Johnson, Kamala Harris and Guy Grande |
| 3:2016cv02351 |
| September 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Relief (Doc. No. 58 ). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/17/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER (1) Granting Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in Their Official Capacity (2) Granting Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in Their Individual Capacity (Doc. No. 32 ). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/12/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER 1) Granting 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration; 2) Denying 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 3) Granting 11 Motion to Amend Complaint; 4) Denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. The Court e ncourages Plaintiff to file his First Amended Complaint with the Court and follow the service requirements to timely and properly serve the federal defendants. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/10/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
