Jones v. Kroll et al
Plaintiff: Elvis Jones
Defendant: Kroll and Daubs
Case Number: 3:2016cv02370
Filed: September 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Jill L. Burkhardt
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation; Order Granting 22 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Order Vacating Pretrial Conference; and Order of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/6/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22 ). Objections to R&R due by 11/2/2018 Replies due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 10/19/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
April 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kroll, Daubs. It is recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims in plaintiff's complaint against defendant Krall shall b e granted and to dismiss without prejudice plaintiff's remaining claims against defendant Krall. It is ordered that objections to the R&R shall be filed no later than 5/2/2017; any reply to the objections shall be filed with the Court no later than 5/9/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 4/17/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in th is case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Defendants are ordered to reply to Plaintif's Complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/12/16 (IFP package prepared) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (kas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Kroll et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elvis Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daubs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?