Larkins vs. Moore

Larkins vs. Moore

Plaintiff:	Maura Larkins
Defendant:	Dr. Thomas Moore
Case Number:	3:2016cv02661
Filed:	October 27, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge:	Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2018	Filing 33 ORDER Denying Leave to Amend; and Order of Dismissal. Larkins' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is denied (Dkt. No. 29 ). Because it is clear that Larkins cannot salvage her complaint by further amendment, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/17/2018. (jdt)
September 11, 2017	Filing 23 ORDER Granting in Part 10 Motion to Dismiss. The FAC is dismissed without prejudice. But because it is not absolutely clear the defects could not be cured by amendment, Larkins will be given an opportunity to amend. If Larkinsbelieves she can succ essfully amend, she must file a motion seeking leave to amend no later than 10/2/2017. If she files a motion by 10/2/2017, Defendants may file an opposition by 10/23/2017. If Larkins wishes to file a reply, she may do so no later than 11/3/2017. If Larkins does not seek leave to amend by 10/2/2017, the Court will construe it as her admission that she cannot correct the defects this order has identified and that her claim may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/11/2017. (lrf)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2018

Filing 33 ORDER Denying Leave to Amend; and Order of Dismissal. Larkins' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is denied (Dkt. No. 29 ). Because it is clear that Larkins cannot salvage her complaint by further amendment, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/17/2018. (jdt)

September 11, 2017

Filing 23 ORDER Granting in Part 10 Motion to Dismiss. The FAC is dismissed without prejudice. But because it is not absolutely clear the defects could not be cured by amendment, Larkins will be given an opportunity to amend. If Larkinsbelieves she can succ essfully amend, she must file a motion seeking leave to amend no later than 10/2/2017. If she files a motion by 10/2/2017, Defendants may file an opposition by 10/23/2017. If Larkins wishes to file a reply, she may do so no later than 11/3/2017. If Larkins does not seek leave to amend by 10/2/2017, the Court will construe it as her admission that she cannot correct the defects this order has identified and that her claim may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/11/2017. (lrf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larkins vs. Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maura Larkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Thomas Moore
Represented By:	Michael R. Goldstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?