Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc v. Avicenna Nutraceutical, LLC et al
| Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc |
| Avicenna Nutraceutical, LLC and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 3:2016cv02810 |
| November 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 Cause Code Unknown |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting Motion for Attorneys' Fees [Doc. 50 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/7/2018. (anh)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Imposing Sanctions. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/14/2018.(anh)
|
|
Filing
47
AMENDED ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/27/2018.(acc)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part 28 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment of Plaintiffs false advertising claim under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act is Granted.The Court declines to retain supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state-law claims, which are hereby Dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/10/2018. (anh)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 24 Motion to Reopen Discovery Related to RFPs 4 and 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 2/13/2018. (anh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
