Blackman v. Mendosa et al
Tony Blackman |
J. Mendosa, Suzan L Hubbard, Quizon, J.T. Delgado, K O'Neal, M. Elizalde, J. Woods and Cheryl K Pliler |
3:2017cv00236 |
February 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Janis L. Sammartino |
Nita L. Stormes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION Without Prejudice For Failing To Pay Filing Fee Required And/or Failing To Move To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ordered that the Court dismisses this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the 6;400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and grants plaintiff 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil f iling and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/23/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)Mailed out Motion to proceed IFP (dxj). |
Filing 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Southern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/7/17. (Hellings, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/8/2017.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.