Arellano v. Paramo
| Raul Arellano |
| Daniel Paramo |
| 3:2017cv00354 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Andrew G. Schopler |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
204
ORDER: The Motion for Court to Address 60(b) Motion (ECF No. 198 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants Petitioner's request to construe the Letter filed on July 21, 2021 (ECF No. 193 ) as a motion brought pursuant to Fed. R . Civ. P. 60(b)(6). The Motion is otherwise denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Letter (ECF No. 193 ), construed as a motion brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Court to Address 60(b) Motion (ECF No. 200 ) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability of this Order is denied. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/30/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER: The Certificate of Appealability as to ECF No. 191 is denied. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/4/2021. (USCA Case Number 21-56214. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER: The Certificate of Appealability as to ECF No. 174 is DENIED. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/8/2020. (USCA Case Number 20-55895. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER: Petitioner's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration (ECF No. 82 ) is Denied. The Motion to Amend Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 80 ) is Granted. The Court certifies the following issues for appeal: Grounds 1-2 , as described in ECF No. 80 . The Clerk of Court shall issue an Amended Judgment certifying Grounds 1-2, as described in ECF No. 80 for appeal. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/26/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
77
AMENDED ORDER: The motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 75 ) is Granted in part and Denied in part. The motion to dismiss the First Amended Petition (ECF No. 33 ) is Granted and a certificate of appealability is Granted. It is further Ordered that the Motions (ECF No. 71 and 73 ) are Denied. The Clerk of the Court shall enter an Amended Judgment in order to allow Petitioner the opportunity to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 08/28/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting Motions REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 17 , 15 , and 21 Motion to for Leave to Amend and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Arellano has filed a request to amend his petition. Respondent has not objected. The Court recommends that this requ est be granted and that Arellano have until 10/2/2017, to file his amended petition. The Court also recommends that respondent have until 11/6/2017, to respond to that amended petition or file a motion to dismiss. Finally, the Court recommends that A rellano's traverse or opposition be due 11/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 8/21/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) A copy of Lodgment 9 and ECF No. 15 with all exhibits sent to Petitioner via U.S. Mail (acc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arellano v. Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Raul Arellano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Paramo | |
| Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
