James v. United States Marshals Service Agents et al
| Kyle James |
| United States Marshals Service Agents, K. Laney, Brown, John Buckley and John Does |
| 3:2017cv00414 |
| February 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Los Angeles |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: (1) Denying Motion for Immediate Relief and Judicial Assistance; and (2) Denying Motion for Access to the Courts [ECF Doc. Nos. 34 , 37 ]. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 03/06/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 32 Motion for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint; and Denying 30 Motion for Immediate Action. Plaintiff is granted sixty (60) days leave to file a FAC from the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/11/18. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: The Court: (1) Denies Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 24 ); (2) Grants in part and Denies in part Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 22 ); (3) Directs the Clerk of the Court to set aside th e Judgment entered on 10/18/2017 (ECF No. 20 ) and vacate the Order dismissing the action without further leave to amend on 10/16/2017 (ECF No. 19 ); (4) Grants Plaintiff sixty (60) days to file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the defici encies of pleading identified in the Court's 08/08/2017 Order. If Plaintiff files a First Amended Complaint that still fails to state a claim, his case may be dismissed without further leave to amend. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/20/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION: The Court dismisses this action in its entirety without further leave to amend. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/16/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER (1) Dismissing Civil Action For Failing To State A Claim And (2) Denying Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt # 9 ): The Court grants forty-five (45) days leave in which to file an Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint, the Court will enter a final Order dismissing this civil action. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/8/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Denying Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt # 2 ) And Dismissing Action Without Prejudice: Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statu tory and administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the Motion to Proceed IFP, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice, and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/13/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. Per Order, a blank IFP motion form also was sent to Plaintiff.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
