Mimms v. State of California et al
| Jared Benjamin Mimms |
| State of California, "Josh, In Home Outreach Team (IHOT) and County of San Diego |
| 3:2017cv00507 |
| March 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Court dismisses Plaintiff's action without prejudice for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Court construes Pla intiff's Complaint as seeking to raise claims under 42 USC 1983, but fails to state a claim for relief under this statute against any of the four Defendants. Plaintiff does plead sufficient facts to demonstrate he has standing to challenge Calif ornia's Laura Law. Plaintiff fails to state a claim under HIPAA because HIPAA does not provide does not provide a private cause of action. Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims raised by Plaintiff's Complaint. If Plaintiff can correct the deficiencies identified in his Complaint, he may file a First Amended Complaint by 4/25/2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/11/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
