Williams v. Chau et al
| Damon Williams |
| John Chau, Steven Roberts, Mary Ann Glynn, Robert Walker, J. Lewis and John Does 1 -10 |
| 3:2017cv00517 |
| March 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER Denying Motion to Alter Judgment [Doc. No. 64 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/10/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 45 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/16/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Denying Request to Enter Default [Doc. No. 57 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/24/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of a Neutral Expert [Doc. No. 36 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 5/15/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER on Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. Nos. 15 , 17 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/24/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
