Cox et al v. Ametek, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Adam Cox
Defendant: Ametek, Inc., Thomas Deeney, Senior Operations, LLC and Does 1 through 100
Case Number: 3:2017cv00597
Filed: March 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P. Curiel
Presiding Judge: Andrew G. Schopler
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 151 Final Judgment and Order Granting: Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 129 ; Motion for Attorneys' Fees, costs, and Incentive Awards 128 ; and Joint Motion for Consent to Exercise Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge 148 . Plaintiffs' claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice, without any award of attorneys' fees or costs except as provided in this Order. The Court will address the pending third-party claims by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/15/20. (dlg)
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER Granting Unopposed 126 Motion for Order (1) Granting Preliminary Approval of Settlement, (2) Certifying Settlement Class, (3) Appointing Representatives and Class Counsel, (4) Approving Notice Plan, and (5) Setting Final Approval Hearing. All pretrial and trial proceedings and deadlines are stayed and suspended until further notice from the Court. Fairness Hearing set for 8/24/2020 at 11:30 AM before Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/13/20. (dlg)
October 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 31 32 45 46 Motions to Dismiss. The motions are denied in all respects except for the TPPs' claims for attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/24/17. (dlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox et al v. Ametek, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Cox
Represented By: John P. Fiske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ametek, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Deeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Senior Operations, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?