Brown et al v. Kernan et al
| Anthony Brown and Larry E. Belton, Sr. |
| Scott Kernan, California Health Care Services, J. Lewis, Daniel A. Paramo, R. Walker, J. Chau, California Correctional Health Care Services, Office of Risk Management and Insurance Agency, A. Horan, J. Kelso, Edmund Gerry Brown , Jr. and California Department of General Services |
| 3:2017cv00693 |
| April 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| William V. Gallo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER: (1) Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim and for Failing to Comply with Court Order; and (2) Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 19 ] as Moot. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/13/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER : 1) Dismissing Plaintiff Belton; 2) Granting Plaintiff Brown's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 2 ]; 3) Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 10 ]; 4) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim; and 5) De nying Motion to Effect Service as Moot [ECF No. 6 ]. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/24/2017. (Copy sent to Scott Kernan, Secretary, CDCR)(Civil Rights Complaint sent to Plaintiff Brown) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
