Davis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Gavin B. Davis |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation and John Gregory Unruh |
| 3:2017cv00701 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Andrew G. Schopler |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER granting Federal Bureau of Investigations' 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Add New Defendants; denying Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Sanctions; denying Plaintiff's 17 Mot ion for Service by Publication; denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Mental Examination. Court grants the FBI's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Court dismisses sua sponte the remaining claims against Defendant Unruh, but gives Plaintiff le ave file an Amended Complaint against Unruh only. Any Amended Complaint must address the concerns expressed by the Court in this Order, and must be filed by 10/20/2017. The remaining motions 7 , 15 , 17 are dismissed as moot or withdrawn Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/27/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 3 Request for Service by U.S. Marshal Service. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/13/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
