Parmer v. San Diego County Jail et al
| David Earl Parmer |
| San Diego County Jail, San Diego Medical Office and Berkmann |
| 3:2017cv00794 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b) and for Failing to Prosecute in Compliance With Court Order Requiring Amendment. The Court dismisses this civil action in its ent irety without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and §1915A(b), and his failure to prosecute pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) i n compliance with the Court's August 30, 2017 and November 16, 2017 Orders. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/12/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: (1) Denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel and (2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). The Court Grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading described in this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that should he choose to file an Amended Complaint, it must be complete by itself, comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), and that any claim not re-alleged will be considered waived. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/29/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Complaint Form Mailed)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: 1) Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis And 2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim. Watch Commander of the San Diego Central Jail, or his designee, is ordered to collect from plaintiff's trust acco unt the $350 filing fee owed in this case by garnishing monthly payments from his account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income and forwarding those payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the accoun t exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading described in this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that should he choose to file an Amended Complaint, it must be complete by itself, comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), and that any claim not re-alleged will be considered waived. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/24/2017. (Watch commander served)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
