Schreiber v. Redhawk Holdings Corp. et al
| Daniel J. Schreiber |
| Redhawk Holdings Corp., Thomas J. Concannon, G. Darcy Klug, Felix C. Spizale, Phillip Harris IV, Andre F. Toce, Sr., Robert Rhune, Jr. and Kav Hundle |
| 3:2017cv00824 |
| April 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER: The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants is granted. (Dkt # 19 ). The Complaint (Dkt # 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Any motion for leave to amend shall be filed within thirty (30) days. If no motion is filed, the Clerk of Court shall close the case. The application for a preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is denied without prejudice. (Dkt # 16 ) Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/26/2017. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER (Re Dkt # 16 ): Plaintiff's Application for a Temporary Restraining Order is denied. Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction will be set for a hearing on 8/3/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 14B. Any formal opposition must be filed no later than 7/17/2017. Any reply must be filed no later than 7/24/2017. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/23/2017. (mdc) Modified text on 6/23/2017 to correct a minor misspelling. NEF was regenerated. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
