Gomez v. Paramo et al
| Steven W. Gomez |
| Daniel Paramo, R. Walker, A. Pope, A. Aguirre, M. Stout, A. Hernandez and P. Logan |
| 3:2017cv00834 |
| April 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer regarding the status of the remaining Defendants P. Logan, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and R.J. Donovan Prison and to file an appropriate joint motion on or before November 7, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 10/7/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: (1) Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23 ); (2) Dismissing Certain Claims With Prejudice; (3) Dismissing Certain Defendants Without Prejudice and With Leave to Amend; and (4) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Fil e the Proposed Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 25 ). The Court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment violation claims. The Court dismisses without prejudice Defendants Warden Paramo, Aguirre, and Stout. Plain tiff is granted leave to amend to provide additional allegations regarding these Defendants' alleged involvement in Plaintiff's placement and maintenance in A-2-B custody status only. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint no later than 9/14/2018. Defendants' motion to dismiss did not address any claims against Defendants CDCR, RJD, Dr. Walker, Pope, and Hernandez. These Defendants are thus ordered to answer the FAC no later than 8/21/2018. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/1/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Court dismisses without leave to amend Plaintiff's constitutional access to courts claim for failure to state a claim which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Court dismisses with leave to amend Plaintiff's claim under Title II of the ADA for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Court will grant Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amend ed Complaint. If Plaintiff wishes to file a Second Amended Complaint, he must do so by 10/30/2017. If Plaintiff does not file a Second Amended Complaint by 10/30/2017, Court will issue instructions the Clerk to issue a summons as to the First Amended Complaint 8 . Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/28/2017. (Blank 1983 Second Amended Complaint form t/w copy if this Order mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
