Alfalma III v. Berryhill

Alfalma III v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Frank Antone Alfama III
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	3:2017cv01002
Filed:	May 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2018	Filing 28 ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; denying 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 21 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/25/2018. (jpp)
June 4, 2018	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Regarding 14 Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. This Court recommends that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied, that the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment be granted, and that J udgment be entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner and dismissing this action with prejudice. Any party having objections to the Court's proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with acopy of this Report and Recommendation. The objections should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." A party may respond to the other party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 6/4/2018.(rmc)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2018

Filing 28 ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; denying 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 21 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/25/2018. (jpp)

June 4, 2018

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Regarding 14 Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. This Court recommends that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied, that the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment be granted, and that J udgment be entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner and dismissing this action with prejudice. Any party having objections to the Court's proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with acopy of this Report and Recommendation. The objections should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." A party may respond to the other party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 6/4/2018.(rmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfalma III v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Antone Alfama III
Represented By:	Nancy Katherine McCombs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Carolyn B. Chen
Represented By:	Thomas C Stahl
Represented By:	U S Attorney CV(Designation Assistant United States Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?