Jefferson v. Hollingsworth et al
| James Leroye Jefferson |
| Kathy Hollingsworth, Lisa Gularte, R. Olivarria, J. McNeil, Damarest Dunn and B. Self |
| 3:2017cv01099 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER Responding to 45 Referral Notice. After review of the record herein, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's appeal lacks any arguable basis in law or fact, and thus is considered as not being taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, the Court hereby REVOKES Plaintiff's IFP status. The Clerk of the Court is directed to notify the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of this Order. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/7/2019. (USCA Case Number 19-55261. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
41
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. In sum, Plaintiff's claims against the Prison Industry Authority are constitutionally barred. This deficiency cannot be cured via further amendment. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action with prejudice.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Denying 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel and for Supporting Evidence Against Defendants. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel and Requests for Evidence is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 5/8/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 27 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim with prejudice as to all three defendants. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's ADA claim without prejudic e and with leave to amend as to all three defendants. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim without prejudice and with leave to amend as to Defendants Gularte and Neil. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to f ile an amended complaint within 60 days from the date this Order is filed. Plaintiff's amended complaint must cure the deficiencies of pleading noted above, and must be complete in itself without reference to the superseded pleading. Defendants not named and all claims not re-alleged in the amended complaint will be deemed to have been waived. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: (1) Denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and (2) Denying Motion for Library Access (ECF 13 , 19 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 11/21/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
