Luminence, LLC v. Top Lighting Corporation et al
| Luminence, LLC |
| Top Lighting Corporation and Julius, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv01110 |
| May 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER. It is hereby ordered that the Motion for Default Judgment and theRequest for Court to Consider Additional Evidence for Attorneys Fees and Costs After Default Judgment are granted. (ECF Nos. 6 , 9 ). Plaintiff is entitled to $4,500 in s tatutory damages, a permanent injunction, and $4,667.04 in attorney's fees and costs. The Court orders Plaintiff to submit a proposed judgment in accordance with this Order within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/9/2018. (rmc)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER: Plaintiff is entitled to $4,500 in statutory damages and to a permanent injunction. Plaintiff may submit any evidence in support of the request for attorney's fees on or before 1/9/2018. The Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 6 ) shall remain pending in order to allow Plaintiff time to submit any additional evidence related to attorney's fees. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/20/2017.(ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
