Green v. Thiessen et al
| Cedric Eugene Green |
| B. Thiessen, M. Lopez and R. Solis |
| 3:2017cv01156 |
| June 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| John A. Houston |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
Order Appointing Pro Bono Counsel Pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(1). Attorney Daniel A. Kaplan appointed for Cedric Eugene Green.. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 07/31/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(bdc)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER (1) SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION RELATING TO EXHAUSTION re 91 , 92 ; (2) ADOPTING IN PART AND DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re [ 89]; (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS re 71 ; AND (4) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL, IMPOSE SANCTIONS, AND FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY re 94 . Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/29/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)
|
|
Filing
89
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 2/19/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
