Yeiser Research & Development LLC v. Teknor Apex Company et al
| Yeiser Research & Development LLC |
| Teknor Apex Company and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2017cv01290 |
| June 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER denying Defendant Teknor Apex Company's 56 Motion for Review and Partial Reversal of Discovery Order. Court affirms the Discovery Order 50 in full. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/20/2019. (jah)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying Defendant Teknor Apex Company's 55 Ex Parte Motion to Stay 50 Order on Discovery Dispute. Defendant Teknor shall comply with Judge Berg's Order by 3/21/2019. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/20/2019. (jah)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Teknor Apex Company's 27 Second Motion to Dismiss. Court denies Teknor's request to dismiss the intentional inference claim insofar as it concerns Costco. Court grants the request to di smiss the intentional interference claims as to retailers with whom Yeiser Research & Development LLC's (YRD) hose competes with Zero G Hose. The claim is dismissed with prejudice to extent it is premised on such conduct. Court denies Teknor 9;s request to dismiss the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and Delaware Uniform Trade Secrets Act (DUTSA) claims for alleged misappropriation of YRD's "business and marketing strategy" as construed in this Order. Defendant Teknor shall filed an amended answer consistent with this Order by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/21/2018. (jah)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Teknor Apex Company's 16 Motion to Dismiss. Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract as to alleged breaches of Sections 4(c), 4(d), and 4(f); conver sion; interference with prospective economic advantage; and unfair competition. Pla's claim of trade secrets misappropriation is dismissed to the extent it concerns Plaintiff's alleged marketing ideas, sales information, and business strate gy. Court dismisses with prejudice Pla's breach of claim as to an alleged breach of Section 9, and Pla's claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Court denies Teknor's Motion to Dismiss Pla's claim r egarding alleged breaches of Sections 4(a), 4(b), and 4(g); trade secrets misappropriation claim insofar as it concerns alleged new compact hose concept and designs; and unjust enrichment. Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint to add a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and cure any pleadings dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by 12/22/2017. Teknor must answer or file a motion to dismiss those new portions of an amended complaint by 1/22/2018. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 11/29/2017. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
