Sony Biotechnology, Inc. v. Chipman Logistics and Relocation et al
| Sony Biotechnology, Inc. |
| Chipman Logistics and Relocation, Torrance Van & Storage Company, Airways Freight Corporation and Does 1-20 |
| Airways Freight Corporation |
| Chipman Logistics and Relocation and Torrance Van & Storage Company |
| 3:2017cv01292 |
| June 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| William V. Gallo |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Setting and OSC Re Dismissal. The Court GRANTS Chipman's motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 9), and DIMISSES the bailment and negligence causes of action WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as alleged agai nst Chipman. Under the Court's analysis, the bailment and negligence causes of action also fail as to Defendant's Airways, and S&M Moving. Based thereon, the Court is issuing an Order to Show Cause why the bailment and negligence causes of action to Defendants Airways, and S&M Moving should not be dismissed. The hearing in this matter is set for 9/5/2017 at 4:00 PM in Courtroom 4A. Accordingly, the Court instructs the Clerk to VACATE the hearing date currently set for 10/5/2017. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/22/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
