Ralph v. Hosseini et al
Plaintiff: John Ralph
Defendant: North County Pizza, Inc., Pizzafella, LLC, Pizza Enterprises, Inc., Pizza Enterprises III, Inc., Slammed Pizza, Inc., Slammed Pizza Jr. Inc., Does 1-25, HAJ, Inc. and D.O.S Pizza, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv01332
Filed: June 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey T. Miller
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 101 Order on: (1) Plaintiff's Corrected Motion to Reopen Case and Confirm Arbitration Award; and (2) Defendant D.O.S. Pizza Inc's Motion to Vacate or Modify Final Arbitration (ECF Nos. 88 , 96 ). Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/26/21. (jmo)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY; DENYING MOTION TO ENJOIN STATE COURT ACTION re 63 Motion to Stay ; denying 63 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/24/2019. (sjm)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER Granting ex parte application to file response to joint motion to dismiss the action. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/9/2018.(gac)
May 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER LIFTING STAY, GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF FLSA CLAIM, STAYS ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION. Court lifts the stay, compels arbitration of all claims alleged in Plaintiffs complaint, and stays the action pending arbitration. Plaintiff i s instructed to file a status report on the progress of the arbitration by November 30, 2018. The failure of Plaintiff to file the status report or to prosecute his claims in arbitration will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/30/2018.(gac)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER provisionally granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Compel arbitration; Staying action. The court provisionally grants the motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs state law claims, defers ruling on the motion to compel arbitration of the FLSA claim pending resolution of the Morris case, and stays the entire action. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/13/2017. (jpp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ralph v. Hosseini et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Ralph
Represented By: Richard M. Paul, III
Represented By: Mark Alan Potashnick
Represented By: Malcolm Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North County Pizza, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pizzafella, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pizza Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pizza Enterprises III, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Slammed Pizza, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Slammed Pizza Jr. Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAJ, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.O.S Pizza, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?