Ware v. Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Ware v. Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers

Ware v. Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers

Plaintiff:	Martin Ware
Defendant:	Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers
Case Number:	3:2017cv01598
Filed:	July 31, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Gonzalo P. Curiel
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Lewis
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2017	Filing 9 ORDER Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice. The Court construes Plaintiff's request 8 as a notice of voluntary dismissal. The Court: Grants 8 Motion for Reconsideration and dismisses the entire action without prejudice; and Denies 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/18/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
August 15, 2017	Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action without Prejudice for Failing to Pay filing Fee and/or Failing to Move to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/15/2017.(Sent IFP form to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2017

Filing 9 ORDER Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice. The Court construes Plaintiff's request 8 as a notice of voluntary dismissal. The Court: Grants 8 Motion for Reconsideration and dismisses the entire action without prejudice; and Denies 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/18/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)

August 15, 2017

Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action without Prejudice for Failing to Pay filing Fee and/or Failing to Move to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/15/2017.(Sent IFP form to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ware v. Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Ware
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Officers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?