Shufelt v. Silva et al
| George W. Shufelt |
| J. Silva, M.D., S. Pasha, M. Glynn, S. Roberts, M.D., R. Walker, D.O., J. Lewis and R. Zhang, M.D. |
| 3:2017cv01652 |
| August 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Lassen |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close the docket. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/20/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; and ORDER of Dismissal. The Court adopts those portions of the R&R to which no objection has been filed. Having reviewed de novo those portions to which Shufelt has filed specific written objections, the Cour t overrules the objections and adopts the R&R. The FAC is dismissed. If Shufelt believes he can successfully amend, he should file an ex parte motion for leave to amend by 3/20/2019. Any opposition is due by 4/4/2019. Shufelt's motion is referred to Magistrate Judge Ruth Montenegro for a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/20/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by R. Zhang, M.D., S. Roberts, M.D., R. Walker, D.O., J. Lewis, J. Silva, M.D., S. Pasha, M. Glynn. Objections to R&R due by 7/30/2018 Replies due by 8/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 7/13/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of First Amended Complaint; and Denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief. Plaintiff's Motion denied as moot. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/21/2017. (IFP packet prepared to be sent to pro se plaintiff via U.S. Mail Service; package includes certified copy of IFP Order - Doc. 4 .) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (jdt)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: 1) Granting 3 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and 2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from priso n trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Scott Kernan, Secretary, CDCR, P.O. Box 942883, Sacramento, California, 942 83-0001. The Court Grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a court approved civil rights complaint form for his use in amending. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 09/25/2017. (Order electronically transmitted and mailed via U.S. Mail Service to Secretary of CDCR) (Plaintiff served copy of this Order and blank civil rights complaint form via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
