Ross v. Padres LP et al
| Van J. Ross |
| Padres LP, San Diego Padres and Ian Graham |
| 3:2017cv01676 |
| August 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER dismissing action without prejudice in its entirety for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts March 28, 2019 Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/03/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 27 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/7/2018. (mpl)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting Defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice, except for his Title VII and ADA claims against individuals, which Court dismisses with prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to re-allege his claims against Defendants that are dismissed without prejudice, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 30 days from the date this Order is filed. Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's request for counsel. Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's request to conduct discovery. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/25/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER:(1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (2) Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, and (3) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Summons and Co mplaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). The Court grants plaintiff's IFP motion 9 and denies as moot Plaintiff's previous 7 IFP motion. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/3/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (mpl)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Denying 5 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2). To proceed with his case, Plaintiff may, within thirty days of the date on which this Order is electronica lly docketed, either (1) pay the $400 filing fee for civil cases, or (2) file a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses the Court's above-mentioned concerns. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/29/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and (2) Denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court Denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP ECF No. 2 . Consequently, the Court Denies without prejudi ce Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel ECF No. 3 . To proceed with his case, Plaintiff may, within 30 days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed, either (1) pay the $400 filing fee for civil cases, or (2) file a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses the Court's above-mentioned concerns. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/29/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
