Orlosky v. Merrill et al
Joseph Orlosky |
William E. Merrill, Transformed Service Inc. and DOES 1 through 50 |
3:2017cv01701 |
August 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
William V. Gallo |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on 10/31/2017, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, directing Plaintiff to file a written response on or before 11/14/2017. To date, Plaintiff has not filed his response. Therefore the Clerk shall enter final judgment dismissing this case without prejudice. This case is terminated.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting 3 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Dismissing Complaint for Failure to State a Claim; and Denying 2 Request for Appointment of Counsel without Prejudice. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff will have 45 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/6/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mxn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.