Limpin et al v. United States of America
| Melchor Karl T. Limpin, Jayson San Agustin and Froilan Q. Mendoza |
| United States of America |
| 3:2017cv01729 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 U.S. Defendant |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Court's Leave to Amend the Original and First Amended Complaint and (2) Plaintiff's Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(B)(6) (ECF Nos. 41 , 46 ). No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/18/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 27 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/25/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/9/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/26/2018. The Court finds that neither the interests of justice nor any exceptional circumstances warrant appointment of counsel at this time and denies Plaintiff's motion. This denial is without prejudice should Plaintiff later be able to make the requisite showing of exceptional circumstances. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff Limpin's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; (2) Dismissing Plaintiffs Mendoza and Agustin Without Prejudice; (3) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service; (4) Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and (5) Denying Motion for Class Certification. The Court Dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs Mendoza and Agustin as plaintiffs and dismisses as moot plaintiffs Mendoza and Agustin's Motions to Proceed IFP, (ECF Nos. 3, 4). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/26/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (IFP Packet Mailed) (mpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
