Asgari v. immigration of phoenix et al
Hamid Asgari |
immigration of phoenix, immigration of California, homeland security (Az), police of Phoenix and FBI (AZ) |
3:2017cv01759 |
August 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
XX US, Outside State |
William Q. Hayes |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER: The Phoenix Municipal Court Judgment and Sentence Order (ECF No. 16 ) is neither "proof that service of the Amended Summons and Complaint was timely effectuated nor a declaration showing good cause for failure to timely effect service upon the Defendants." (ECF No. 14 at 1). The Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) remains Dismissed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 04/19/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) |
Filing 14 ORDER: The record reflects that Plaintiff has filed neither proof that service of the Amended Summons and Complaint was timely effectuated nor a declaration showing good cause for failure to timely effect service upon the Defendants. It is hereby Ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 03/05/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The Motion for Appointment for Counsel (ECF No. 2 ) is Denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/16/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.