D.R. Mason Construction Co. v. GBOD, LLC et al
| D.R. Mason Construction Co. |
| GBOD, LLC, Raymond Davoudi and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 3:2017cv01779 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| William V. Gallo |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER: (1) Granting Renewed Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel; and (2) Ordering Plaintiff to File Notice of Identification of Substitute Counsel. The Court grants the motion for leave to withdraw as counsel of record. (ECF No. 27 .) Additional ly, the Court orders D.R. Mason Corporation to file a Notice of Identification of Substitute Counsel no later than 8/15/2018. If no such notice is filed, then the Court will dismiss this action in its entirety for failure to retain counsel. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 7/31/2018. Attorneys Matthew J. Faust and Yasaman Sharif terminated. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Plaintiff's federal securities claims do not pose a substantial federal question and are subject to dismissal. Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint with leave to amend. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/13/2018. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
