Rivera v. San Diego Sheriffs Dept.

Rivera v. San Diego Sheriffs Dept.

Plaintiff:	Cesar Rivera
Defendant:	San Diego Sheriffs Dept.
Case Number:	3:2017cv01848
Filed:	September 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Bernardino
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge:	Andrew G. Schopler
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 2, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER Denying as Moot 5 Motion to Correct Errors; and Order Denying 5 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Plaintiff's request to have the Court add allegations to his complaint for him is denied. The Court finds no exceptional circum stances are present, and Rivera's request for appointment of counsel is denied. If Rivera thinks he can successfully amend his complaint, he must file an amended complaint as ordered, by 10/9/2017. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/29/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)
September 14, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and Order of Dismissal. The IFP motion shows Rivera lacks funds to pay the filing fee, and is granted. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. If Rivera thinks he can successfully amend to correct the defects this order has identified, he may file an amended complaint no later than 10/2/2017. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/14/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 2, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER Denying as Moot 5 Motion to Correct Errors; and Order Denying 5 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Plaintiff's request to have the Court add allegations to his complaint for him is denied. The Court finds no exceptional circum stances are present, and Rivera's request for appointment of counsel is denied. If Rivera thinks he can successfully amend his complaint, he must file an amended complaint as ordered, by 10/9/2017. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/29/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)

September 14, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and Order of Dismissal. The IFP motion shows Rivera lacks funds to pay the filing fee, and is granted. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. If Rivera thinks he can successfully amend to correct the defects this order has identified, he may file an amended complaint no later than 10/2/2017. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/14/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivera v. San Diego Sheriffs Dept.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cesar Rivera
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego Sheriffs Dept.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?