Ingalls v. AMG Demolition & Environmental Services et al
Todd Ingalls |
AMG Demolition & Environmental Services, Kelly & Assoc., Inc., Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC, Zephyr Partners-Re, LLC, 36 Bhill Owner, LLC, De Waal Enterprises, Inc., Steve Gaetske Trucking LLC, Just Truckin Inc., Wollaston Transportation, Phillip Pickett Trucking, Noriega & Partners Trucking, Marrams Trucking, Atkin Trucking and Franklin Trucking |
3:2017cv02013 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Anthony J. Battaglia |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 6972 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 56 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiff's FAC. (Doc. No. 50) The dismissal i s without prejudice and with leave to amend. Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003) ("Dismissal with prejudice and without leave to amend is not appropriate unless it is clear... that the complaint could not b e saved by amendment."). Plaintiff will have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file his second amended complaint addressing the deficiencies noted herein. No new claims or parties may be added without leave of Court. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/22/2019. (acc) |
Filing 46 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. As this is only Ingalls's first complaint, he is granted leave to amend. Ingalls mustfile his first amended complaint within fourteen (14) days from the issuance of this Ordercuring the deficiencies noted herein. Failure to file an amended complaint will result indismissal of this action. Additionally, as the Court has not dismissed Ingalls's complaint with prejudice, Moving Defendants' request for costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) isDENIED.. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/4/2018. (acc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.