Securities and Exchange Commission v. de Nicolas Gutierrez et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Gerardo de Nicolas Gutierrez, Carlos Javier Moctezuma Velasco, Ramon Lafarga Batiz and Noe Corrales Reyes |
3:2017cv02086 |
October 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
XX Outside US |
Jill L. Burkhardt |
John A. Houston |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0077 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Granting 7 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Effect Alternative Service. Plaintiff's Motion for Alternative service is GRANTED. It is hereby ordered: 1. Plaintiff shall serve defendant de Nicolas via e-mail and overnight delivery to d e Nicolas' U.S.-based counsel, Paul Alfieri, Esq. of Reed Smith LLP. 2. Plaintiff shall serve defendant Moctezuma via email and overnight delivery to U.S.-based counsel, G. Robert Gage, Jr., Esq., of Gage Spencer & Fleming LLP. 3. Plaintiff shall serve defendant Lafarga via email. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/19/2020. (tcf) |
Filing 9 ORDER Vacating Hearing and Taking Motion Under Submission. Plaintiffs Motion for Order Allowing Service of Summons and Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) (ECF No. 7 ) is taken under submission without oral argument, and the hearing date set for August 12, 2019, at 2:30 p.m., before this Court, is VACATED. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 8/7/2019. (tcf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.