Natural Thoughts, Incorporated v. Performance Touch, LLC et al
| Natural Thoughts, Incorporated |
| Performance Touch, LLC, The Hygenic Corporation and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 3:2017cv02148 |
| October 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 96 Defendants' Renewed Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 6/12/19. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Motions to Seal [ECF Nos. 66 , 72 , 77 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 5/17/2019. (anh)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Denying Joint Motion to Stay the Case for 60 Days [Doc. 89 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 5/14/2019. (anh)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Denying: (1) Joint Motion to Continue Briefing Schedule; and (2) Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Without Prejudice (ECF Nos. 86 , 87 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 5/13/2019. (tcf)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER Denying Motion to Compel Continued Depositions Without Prejudice [ECF No. 65 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 5/8/2019. (anh)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/27/2018. (acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
