Van Batenburg v. Paramo et al
| William Van Batenburg |
| Daniel Paramo, B. Self, R. Olivarria, York, Lukasic, Zuk and Herrera |
| 3:2017cv02214 |
| October 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b )(2). Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff granted 30 days leave from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint by 1/29/2018. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/2/2018. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (Blank Amended 1983 Complaint form t/w copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
