Nina Oshana Separate Property Trust v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Nina Oshana Separate Property Trust |
Bank of America, N.A., Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and DOES 1-100 |
3:2017cv02408 |
November 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER: The motion for attorney fees filed by Defendant Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (ECF No. 42 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/11/2019. (ag) |
Filing 36 ORDER: The motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 28 , 30 , 31 ) are Granted. Any motions to file an amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this order in accordance with Local Rule 7.1. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/29/2018. (ajs) |
Filing 27 ORDER: The motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC are Denied as Moot.(ECF Nos. 4 , 6 , 9 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 07/11/2018. (ajs) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to File a second amended complaint. No later than ten (10) days from the date this Order is issued, Plaintiff may file the proposed second amended complaint attached to the motion as Exhibit 1. (ECF No. 21-2). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/03/2018. (jpp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.