Jones v. Donovan et al
Petitioner: Kevin W. Jones
Respondent: Richard J Donovan and Daniel Paramo
Case Number: 3:2017cv02454
Filed: December 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: (1) Dismissing Second Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim and as Frivolous Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b); (2) Denying Motions for 47 Temporary Restraining Order and 49 Preliminary Injunction; (3) Denying 57 Motion for Request to Meet and Confer as Moot; and (4) Issuing OSC Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/6/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION re 40 Motion Motion for Continuance Order Requested for Permanent Injunction. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/5/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER (1) DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME; (2) DENYUING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; (3) DENYING MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; AND (4) DENYING MOTION TO REQUEST ORDER OPPOSING COURT ORDER.. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/17/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: (1) Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim and as Frivolous Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b); and (2) Denying Motion for Extension of Time to Amend as Moot. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/20/2018. (Copy of form mailed)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
February 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: (1) Granting Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2 ); (2) Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3 ); and (3) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/23/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR)(Civil Rights Complaint form mailed)(mxn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Donovan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin W. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard J Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?