Munson v. Murad et al
| Kenneth Munson |
| Alan P. Murad, Trezyia N. Murad, Fast Fuel, Inc., M Fuel I Inc. and DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2017cv02499 |
| December 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Denying 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Having reviewed the Court's previous order, the Court is satisfied that it committed no error. Plaintiff has not provided any newly discovered evidence, nor has there been an intervening change in controlling law. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/23/2018. (rmc)
|
|
Filing
19
DEFAULT JUDGMENT. The Court grants in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendants Alan P. Murad, Trezyia N. Murad, Fast Fuel, Inc., and M Fuel I Inc. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment against Defendants, and in favor of Plaintiff in the total amount of $4,600.00. The Court orders Defendants to provide and designate accessible parking in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines at the property located at 4505 Clairemont Mesa Blvd., San Diego, California. (rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
