Gonzalez Figeroa v. Montgomery et al
| Alberto Gonzalez Figeroa |
| Warren Montgomery and Kamala D. Harris |
| 3:2017cv02572 |
| December 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Adopting 11 , 20 Report and Recommendations, and Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/21/20. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Alberto Gonzalez Figeroa. No later than March 25, 2019, any party to this action may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Any reply to the objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than April 8, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 2/25/19.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For Order Dismissing Unexhausted Claim re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Alberto Gonzalez Figeroa. Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2018 Replies due by 5/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 3/30/18.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
