Sharif v. Casian
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 9, 2018
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A (b), and his failure to prosecute pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) in compliance with the Court's 3/13/2018 Order. The Court further certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|March 13, 2018
ORDER 1) Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 2) Denying 5 Motion for Clerk to Issue Summons; and Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the ac count and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Co mplaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/12/2018. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR; all non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a copy of this Order was mailed to the Secretary of CDCR at the indicated address.)(jdt)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?