Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
| Airhawk International, LLC |
| Ontel Products Corporation and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2018cv00073 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Andrew G. Schopler |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDER Directing Parties to Submit a Joint Proposed Pretrial Scheduling Order. The Court DIRECTS the parties to meet and confer and submit a joint proposed pretrial scheduling order to the Court on or before 6/8/2022. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/24/2022. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
163
Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney. Ontel Products Corporation substitutes Ben Michael Davidson as counsel of record in place of Scott Phillip Shaw. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/10/2022. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER Granting 147 Joint Motion to Extend Trial Date and Modify the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order. Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law is due by 9/13/2021. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 10/12/2021 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 3D before Judge Michael M. Anello. The Proposed Pretrial Order is due by 10/29/2021. Trial is set for 11/9/2021 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 3D before Judge Michael M. Anello. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/22/2021. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER Denying 139 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/8/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 136 Joint Motion to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order. A Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law is due by 10/5/2020. A Proposed Pretrial Order is due by 11/25/2020. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 11/13/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3D before Judge Michael M. Anello. Trial is set for 12/8/2020 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 3D before Judge Michael M. Anello. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/21/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER Re: Redacted Version of January 2, 2020 Order. To assist the Court in determining the appropriate extent of the redactions, and in light of the Court's sealing order (Doc. No. 116 ), the Court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint propose d redacted version of the Order directly to Chambers no later than January 10, 2020. The Court will review the proposed submission and issue a redacted version of the January 2, 2020 Order in due course. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/3/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER denying 122 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/20/2019. (jms)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER for Supplemental Briefing Re: Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief addressing the merits of Defendant's objections. Plaintiff's supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages, must be filed on or before Thursday, December 12, 2019. Defendant, as the objecting party, may file a responsive supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages, on or before Monday, December 16, 2019. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/9/2019.(tcf)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 74 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Airhawk's motion to compel is only granted to this extent: In the next 14 days, Ontel must (1) file a stipulation as outlined above or (2) disclose its trademark report as well as the four discovery pages, Bates-marked ONTEL003669-ONTEL003672. If Ontel chooses the second option, it must make a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent available for one additional hour of deposition within 30 days of completing the disclosure ordered above. Otherwise, Airhawk's motion is denied. In the event of an objection to the District Judge, those deadlines will be stayed pending resolution of the objection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 7/23/2019. (rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
