Langer v. Kiser et al
| Chris Langer |
| Milan Kiser, Diana Kiser, Frank P. Rofail, David Matthew Taylor and DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2018cv00195 |
| January 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER Denying 94 Defendants' Motion for Attorney's Fees Without Prejudice Until Conclusion of Appeal. If Defendants re-file their motion, it shall be filed within thirty (30) days of any decision from the Ninth Circuit. If the parties so desire, they may file a document simply referring the Court to the ECF Number of their original briefing (i.e., motion, opposition, and reply brief) rather than submitting new briefing. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 4/5/2021. (mme)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude [ECF Nos. 65 , 66 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/30/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER: Denying (1) Motion to Strike Document, ECF # 21 ; (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF # 24 . Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 08/23/2019. (mme)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion or Leave to Answer and Add First Counterclaim for Trespass [Doc. No. 14 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/17/2018. (anh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
