Hammler v. Hernandez et al
| Allen Hammler |
| J. Hernandez and A. Magallanes |
| 3:2018cv00259 |
| February 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER Denying 103 Motion to Proceed In forma pauperis on Appeal. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 10/20/2022. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals notified electronically. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 86 ], Granting Motion for Terminating Sanctions [Doc. No. 81 ] and Dismissing Case With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 12/21/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)(dsn)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on Defendants' Motion for Terminating Sanctions [ECF No. 81 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 11/17/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [ECF No. 65 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 6/22/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice "Objection to Experts" [Doc. No. 50 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/5/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [ECF. Nos. 41 , 44 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 1/8/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 32 ] and Granting Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 28 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/5/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 28 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 6/3/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 21 ] and Granting In Part Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 15 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/9/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No 15 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 12/11/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: 1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 3 ] and 2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and Fed.R.Civ. 4(c)(3). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/6/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/13/2018. (Copy of blank IFP form mailed)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
