Fourte International Limited BVI et al v. Pin Shine Industrial Co., LTD. et al
Fourte International Limited BVI and Fourte International SDN. BHD. |
Pin Shine Industrial Co., LTD., Suzhou Pinshine Technology Co., LTD., Suzhou Sunshine Technology Co., LTD and Bobbin & Tooling Electronics International Company of BVI |
3:2018cv00297 |
February 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Cynthia Bashant |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 21 Motion for Order Authorizing Alternative Method of Service. Plaintiffs may serve this Order, Summons and Complaint on Defendants by sending email messages, return receipt requested to Defendants' principal, S tephen Huang at Stephen@pinshine.com and to Defendants' California counsel, Alan Chen at acchen@zuberlaw.com. Plaintiffs must serve Defendants and file proof of service by 1/23/2019. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/17/2019. (jah) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 5 Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Alternative Means of Service of Summon and Complaint; denying Plaintiffs' 9 Supplemental Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendants Suzhou Pinshine Technology Co. Ltd and Suzhou Sunshine Technology Co., Ltd by Personal Service to Their California Counsel. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/11/2018. (jah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.