Gordon v. Mudd et al
| Jarrod Gordon |
| Mudd, Tri City Medical Center and Erin |
| 3:2018cv00376 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Riverside |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Andrew G. Schopler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
Order Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's FAC for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b), and grants him 45 days leave from the date of this Order in which to file a Second Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/23/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) Granting 3 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and (2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of t he Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within the time provided, the Court will enter a final Order dismissing this civil action based both o n Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2 (B) and 1915A(b), and his failure to prosecute in compliance with a court order requiring amendment. The Clerk of Court is direc ted to mail a court approved form civil rights complaint to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/16/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR, Prisoner 1983 packet mailed to plaintiff) (rmc)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Court hereby dismisses this action sua sp onte without prejudice for failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and grants Plaintiff 45 days leave from the date this Order is fi led to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Co mplaint. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with this Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis." If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the 6;400 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)'s fee requirements and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/21/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(IFP Form mailed)(rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
