Price v. Grand Bank for Savings, FSB et al
Natalie Price |
Grand Bank for Savings, FSB, Grand Financial Corporation and DOES 1 - 20 |
3:2018cv00440 |
February 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Larry Alan Burns |
Nita L. Stormes |
Foreclosure |
42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 35 ). Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/29/2019. (jdt) |
Filing 27 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 14 ); ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Strike (Dkt. 15 ); ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens (Dkt. 23 ). Grand Bank's corresponding request for attorneys' fees is denied. Dkt. 23 . Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/22/2019. (jdt) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 4 ); ORDER Denying Motion to Strike (Dkt. 5 ). Price should only file an amended complaint in this Court if she believes she can correct the various deficiencies identified. If she does, she shall file the amended complaint by 11/5/2018. Defendants' Motion to Strike is denied as moot (Dkt. 5 ). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/4/2018. (jdt) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/27/2018.(jdt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.