Pacheco v. Berryhill

Pacheco v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Teresa Pacheco
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	3:2018cv00502
Filed:	March 8, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Anthony J. Battaglia
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 31, 2019	Filing 17 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Remand; granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 15 Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby: (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Block's R&R, (Doc. No. 15); (2) GRANTS Defendant's summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 12); and (3) DENIES Plaintiff's summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 10). The Court Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/31/2019. (acc) (sjt).
August 27, 2018	Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Regarding Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Any party having objections to the Court's proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a c opy of this Report and Recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The objections should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." A party may respond to the other party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). See id. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 8/27/2018.(acc)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 31, 2019

Filing 17 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Remand; granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 15 Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby: (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Block's R&R, (Doc. No. 15); (2) GRANTS Defendant's summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 12); and (3) DENIES Plaintiff's summary judgment motion, (Doc. No. 10). The Court Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/31/2019. (acc) (sjt).

August 27, 2018

Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Regarding Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Any party having objections to the Court's proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a c opy of this Report and Recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The objections should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." A party may respond to the other party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). See id. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 8/27/2018.(acc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacheco v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Pacheco
Represented By:	Matty Michael Sandoval
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Thomas C. Stahl
Represented By:	Daniel P. Talbert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?